ATF PRESS RELEASE REVEALS
HOW GUNS ARE REALLY TRAFFICKED
It Also Reveals The Insanity Of Extreme Gun Control
Does Owning A Gun Really Triple Your Chances Of Being Murdered?
Where Did This Idea Come From? What Is The Evidence?
Why NYRPA V. Bruen May Lead To Most Blue State Gun Laws Being Struck Down
Why Concealed Carry May Only Be The Beginning
Two Attacks In Less Than A Year, Had Very Different Outcomes
Former Paramedic Explains Why Expanding Background Checks Will Not Stop Severely Mentally Ill Persons From Obtaining Firearms, And What Just Might Do So
Most Mass Shooters, Including Those With Mental Illness, Obtained Their Firearms After Passing A Background Check. Expanding Background Checks Won’t Stop Them
Why More Gun Control Laws Will Not Produce More Positive Results
Our Gun Control Laws Are Already Producing The Maximum Positive Effect Possible, More Laws Aimed At Law Abiding Buyers Will Not Help – And Will Actually Hurt!
How The 2nd Amendment’s
Preface Could Enable States To Nullify Federal Gun Bans
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Those of us who have been
involved in the gun rights battle for some time have often heard gun
control advocates try to nullify the operative clause (“the right of
the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”) by
referring to the preface (“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to
the security of a free State”) and arguing that the 2nd Amendment only
protects the right of states to maintain the National Guard.
Of course, this absurd argument was rejected by the Supreme Court in
Heller and McDonald, which ruled that the 2A protects “a personal right
unconnected with militia service”.
However, there is a major error in reasoning when equating the National Guard. and the state militia. The error is found in the very name “National Guard” - it is a national force that is ultimately in control of the national – not state governments. It is therefore NOT a state militia. So, what state’s right does the 2nd Amendment protect?
(Click here for more.)
However, there is a major error in reasoning when equating the National Guard. and the state militia. The error is found in the very name “National Guard” - it is a national force that is ultimately in control of the national – not state governments. It is therefore NOT a state militia. So, what state’s right does the 2nd Amendment protect?
(Click here for more.)
